Teacher Statistics Back to Wilson page | Home   |   Comments  
hr
Evaluate
this teacher

bar
David Wilson teaches in the Undergraduate Studies department at University of Toledo in Ohio. This teacher has been evaluated 1 time(s). The first evaluation for this teacher was received: Spring 2001.
1. What kind of teacher was this individual? 100% Good. 0% Average. 0% Bad.
2. The teacher encouraged: 100% Class discussions.
0% Small group discussions.
100% Questions.
 0% Students to learn each others names.
0% Hands-on activities.
100% Creativity.
 0% Understanding over memorization.
100% Memorization over understanding.
3. Do you think that the teacher cared about the success of the students? 100% Completely-the teacher was friendly and truly wanted each student to excel!
0% Yes, the teacher was available to students.
0% No, the teacher seemed indifferent to student problems.
0% Almost never-the teacher had better things to do!
4. His/her teaching style was: 100% Organized and easy to understand!
0% Disorganized but understandable.
0% Organized far too much. Not flexible enough.
0% Disorganized and hard to follow!
5. Do you think the teacher knew the subject matter? 100% Completely!
0% Yes.
0% Somewhat.
0% The students knew more than the teacher!
6. Would you take this teacher again? 100% Absolutely!
0% Yes.
0% No.
0% Not even if my life depended on it!
7. How difficult would it be to teach yourself this material? 0% Very easy!
0% Some work required.
100% Hard.
0% Extremely difficult!
8. In addition to speaking the teacher also used: The board for writing:
0% Much of the material.
100% Minimal or outline.
 An overhead projector:
0% During every lecture.
100% Sometimes.
 0% Maps or Wall charts.
100% TV or video projector.
0% Slide projector.
9. What influenced your grade? 100% Tests.
0% Quizzes.
0% Home Work.
 0% Attendance.
0% Participation.
0% Lab Work.
 0% Extra Credit.
100% Written Reports.
0% Special Projects.
10. What did you think about the home work? 100% There was no home work.
0% It was very helpful!
0% It did help, but could have been improved.
0% Most of it was useless.
0% It did not help me at all!
11. What type of questions were on the tests? 0% No Tests.
0% Multiple Choice.
0% True-False.
 0% Identifying.
0% Fill in the blank.
0% Oral questions.
 100% Essay.
0% Working the problem from information.
12. Where did the test questions come from? 0% All from lecture notes.
100% Some from notes some from the textbook.
0% All from the textbook.
13. Did the students have a good idea of what the test questions would be? 100% Yes.
 0% Some.
 0% No.
14. How many of these were given? Tests:
    0% 1              0%   9
100% 2              0% 10
    0% 3              0% 11
    0% 4              0% 12
    0% 5              0% 13
    0% 6              0% 14
    0% 7              0% 15
    0% 8              0% >15
 Quizzes:
    0% 1              0%   9
    0% 2              0% 10
    0% 3              0% 11
    0% 4              0% 12
    0% 5              0% 13
    0% 6              0% 14
    0% 7              0% 15
    0% 8              0% >15
 Written Reports:
100% 1              0%   9
    0% 2              0% 10
    0% 3              0% 11
    0% 4              0% 12
    0% 5              0% 13
    0% 6              0% 14
    0% 7              0% 15
    0% 8              0% >15
15. How difficult were these? Tests:
0% Very easy!
0% Some work required.
0% Hard.
100% Extremely difficult!
 Quizzes:
0% Very easy!
0% Some work required.
0% Hard.
0% Extremely difficult!
 Written Reports:
0% Very easy!
0% Some work required.
0% Hard.
100% Extremely difficult!
16. Comments: (The first comment is the most recent.)
  • Best teacher at UT!


 

  
  		 
hr